My project centres on rediscovering the figure of Laura Cereta (1469–1499), one of the foremost
humanists and protofeminist writers of fifteenth-century Italy. Born into a well-to-do family in
Brescia, Cereta is recognised as one of the earliest and most prominent contributors to the Querelle
de femmes, the wide-ranging European debate on the nature, education, and dignity of women that
unfolded between the fifteenth and eighteenth centuries.
This study takes as its starting point the 1640 edition prepared by Jacopo Filippo Tomasini, the
Italian scholar and historian, entitled Laurae Ceretae Brixiensis Feminae Clarissimae Epistolae
(Padua, 1640). I focus in particular on the paratexts Tomasini appended to his edition, in which he
organises and presents biographical information about the humanist. The editor’s originality lies in
the way he structures Cereta’s life and literary project, moving away from the stereotyped
biographical model that often characterised the humanist tradition.
Within the history of Italian literary criticism, women writers have frequently undergone a process
of iconisation: stereotypes have shaped the construction of their biographies, turning them into
symbolic figures rather than complex historical subjects. Biographical accounts often reduce their
lives to anecdotal material emphasising the exceptional or “rare” nature of the female writer,
leaving significant gaps in the reconstruction of both their works and their lived experience.
Against this tendency, Tomasini adopts an innovative approach. He traces the various stages of
Cereta’s life and intellectual development by drawing on passages from her own letters, which he
typographically distinguishes (in italics) from his editorial commentary. By incorporating this first-
hand voice, he produces a more vivid and persuasive biography, one in which the humanist appears
to speak directly about her life, aspirations, fears, and adversities. In his pursuit of authenticity,
Tomasini even includes Cereta’s own prologue—also in italics—where she sets out her poetic
principles.
The second axis of my project consists of a close reading of Cereta’s texts. I begin with the poetic
programme articulated in the letter Ad Lectorem, entitled Laurae Ceretae Brixianae, in titulum
Epistolarum Prologus, which Tomasini places after his paratexts. In this letter, Cereta explains that
she chose to commit her thoughts to writing in order to grant them a durable and secure value, as
opposed to something fleeting or illusory.
I have also selected a number of letters in which Cereta demonstrates her mastery of the epistolary
genre and her ability to construct a solid, effective, and carefully crafted personal discourse. In these
missives she remains faithful to the poetic principle announced in the paratext addressed to the
reader—vivas figuras, ingenium, ex sententiarum pondo, parturit (Tomasini, 1640, fols.
A3r–A3v)—deploying vivid imagery, intellectual acuity, and sententious density. Through these
strategies, she asserts her voice and her place within the humanist tradition.
In the texts analysed, Cereta not only articulates her lived experience but also formulates a precise
conception of her intellectual vocation. Her letter on the descent into hell engages with earlier
literary models, such as that of Faltonia Betitia Proba, thereby demonstrating her command of
classical tradition and her capacity to enter into dialogue with it from a female perspective.
Particularly significant is the letter in which Cereta describes embroidery as a metaphor for her
writing. The ekphrasis of this embroidery reveals how literature does not reproduce material reality
but instead constructs a textual image that generates an effect of visuality and meaning. Centuries
later, contemporary theorists—such as Luz Aurora Pimentel—would conceptualise these
mechanisms by explaining that literature produces signifying objects within discourse. Cereta thus
2
anticipates this theoretical formulation by demonstrating that representation does not copy reality
but symbolically constructs it.
Taken together, Cereta’s epistolary work reveals a conscious strategy of intellectual self-assertion.
Through the use of metaphor, paratext, and the construction of a female literary genealogy, she
negotiates with classical tradition in order to question and erode the limits it imposes on women’s
writing.
– María Ángeles Robles
Independent researcher